• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Evergreen Small Business

Actionable Insights from Small Business CPAs

  • Home
  • Small Business FAQ
  • Monographs
    • Business Planning Workbook
    • Download Your Free Copy of the Thirteen Word Retirement Plan
    • Five Minute Payroll Monograph (2019 Edition)
    • LLC Operating Agreement
    • Maximizing PPP Loan Forgiveness
    • Maximizing Sec. 199A Deductions Monograph
    • Preparing Form 3115 for the Tangible Property Regulations
    • Preparing U.S. Tax Returns for International Taxpayers
    • Real Estate Tax Loopholes & Secrets
    • Red Portfolio Black Portfolio FAQ and Download
    • Sample Corporate Bylaws
    • Setting Low Salaries for S Corporations
    • Small Business Tax Deduction Secrets
    • Small Businesses and the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)
    • Joining Our Affiliate Program
  • Our Bloggers
  • Free LLC Formation Kits
    • Alabama LLC
    • Alaska LLC
    • Arizona LLC
    • Arkansas LLC
    • California LLC
    • Colorado LLC
    • Connecticut LLC
    • Delaware LLC
    • Florida LLC
    • Georgia LLC
    • Hawaii LLC
    • Idaho LLC
    • Illinois LLC
    • Indiana LLC
    • Iowa LLC
    • Kansas LLC
    • Kentucky LLC
    • Louisiana LLC
    • Maine LLC
    • Maryland LLC
    • Massachusetts LLC
    • Michigan LLC
    • Minnesota LLC
    • Mississippi LLC
    • Missouri LLC
    • Montana LLC
    • Nebraska LLC
    • Nevada LLC
    • New Hampshire LLC
    • New Jersey LLC
    • New Mexico LLC
    • New York LLC
    • North Carolina LLC
    • North Dakota LLC
    • Ohio LLC
    • Oklahoma LLC
    • Oregon LLC
    • Pennsylvania LLC
    • Rhode Island LLC
    • South Carolina LLC
    • South Dakota LLC
    • Tennessee LLC
    • Texas LLC
    • Utah LLC
    • Vermont LLC
    • Virginia LLC
    • Washington LLC
    • West Virginia LLC
    • Wisconsin LLC
    • Wyoming LLC
  • S Corporation Kits
    • Alabama S Corporation
    • Alaska S Corporation
    • Arizona S Corporation
    • Arkansas S Corporation
    • California S Corporation
    • Colorado S Corporation
    • Connecticut S Corporation
    • Delaware S Corporation
    • Florida S Corporation
    • Georgia S Corporation
    • Hawaii S Corporation
    • Idaho S Corporation
    • Illinois S Corporation
    • Indiana S Corporation
    • Iowa S Corporation
    • Kansas S Corporation
    • Kentucky S Corporation
    • Louisiana S Corporation
    • Maine S Corporation
    • Maryland S Corporation
    • Massachusetts S Corporation
    • Michigan S Corporation
    • Minnesota S Corporation
    • Mississippi S Corporation
    • Missouri S Corporation
    • Montana S Corporation
    • Nebraska S Corporation
    • Nevada S Corporation
    • New Hampshire S Corporation
    • New Jersey S Corporation
    • New Mexico S Corporation
    • New York S Corporation
    • North Carolina S Corporation
    • North Dakota S Corporation
    • Ohio S Corporation
    • Oklahoma S Corporation
    • Oregon S Corporation
    • Pennsylvania S Corporation
    • Rhode Island S Corporation
    • South Carolina S Corporation
    • South Dakota S Corporation
    • Tennessee S Corporation
    • Texas S Corporation
    • Utah S Corporation
    • Vermont S Corporation
    • Virginia S Corporation
    • Washington S Corporation
    • West Virgina S Corporation
    • Wisconsin S Corporation
    • Wyoming S Corporation
  • Contact Nelson CPA
You are here: Home / S corporation / Biden Tax Plan Starts Long Slow Death of the S Corporation

Biden Tax Plan Starts Long Slow Death of the S Corporation

September 19, 2021 By Stephen Nelson CPA

Bid tax plan starts slow motion death of S corporation.I guess it had to happen. Eventually. The end of the S corporation, I mean.

People have complained about the loophole, gosh, probably since President Eisenhower’s administration created it.

The triggering event? President Biden and the House Democrats’ tax proposal to subject working S corporation shareholders to the net investment income tax. But the situation is complicated. Messy.

So, I’m going to talk here about the slow death of the S corporation. Why it occurs. And what you can do if the death matters to your business. Or to the businesses of your clients.

One other thing to say as we start. I’m going to use rounded, really simplified examples here. That’ll make this discussion shorter. Easier to digest.

And then one high level point to start with? The death occurs because the new tax on S corporations ignores inflation. But let’s dig into the details.

How S Corporations Save Tax

To start, you need to understand how S corporations save entrepreneurs payroll taxes, including Social Security taxes, Medicare taxes, and then the Medicare surtax and net investment income tax (which are more commonly known as the Obamacare taxes).

Say an entrepreneur pays him or herself a fair salary. On that income, she or he pays Social Security taxes, and possibly Medicare and Obamacare taxes.

But say the business the entrepreneur runs generates another $100,000 of business profit in addition to those wages

On that additional non-wage income, the entrepreneur still pays income taxes.

But with an S corporation she or he doesn’t pay payroll taxes. And that is how S corporations save business owners taxes.

In comparison? If the entrepreneur operates as a sole proprietorship and makes the exact same amount of money? She or he essentially pays both income and payroll taxes on all the profit.

Furthermore, the same basic accounting occurs if an entrepreneur works as a partner in a partnership. In that situation, the partner pays both income and payroll taxes on all the profit.

Note: We have a long discussion about how S corporations save taxes here: The Million Dollar S Corporation Mistake.

How Biden Tax Plan Starts the Slow Death of S Corporation

What President Biden proposes? And what the House Ways and Means Committee puts into writing? A rule that says an entrepreneur pays the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax if the entrepreneur’s income rises high enough.

Specifically, the rule says that if an entrepreneur files as a single person, she or he pays the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax once modified adjusted gross income hits $400,000. And if an entrepreneur files as a married person, she or he pays the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax once modified adjusted gross income hits $500,000.

A clarification: A taxpayer pays the Obamacare tax on the amount by which modified adjusted gross income exceeds the threshold. A single person with a modified adjusted gross income of, say, $410,000, pays no 3.8 percent tax on that first $400,000. Only on a part of that last $10,000.

Who Gets Hit Initially with New S Corporation Tax

Very correctly, Mr. Biden and House Democrats point out that in 2021, those modified adjusted gross income thresholds mean basically only taxpayers in the top one percent get hit.

For the record, I double-checked. The Democrats are absolutely right.

Today? The new tax on S corporations ignores roughly 99 percent of the taxpayers in the country.

Note: A great paper that discusses and coincidently profiles who the Biden tax plan targets appears here: Capitalists in the Twenty-first Century.

The thing that people miss? And something, frankly, entrepreneurs, business owners and professional advisors need to pay attention to?

Slowly but efficiently, inflation expands the number of people subject to the Obamacare tax over time.

Why? Because tax law fails to adjust those $400,000 and $500,000 thresholds for inflation.

And what that means is, more quickly than you might guess? A larger and larger group of S corporation shareholders pay the Obamacare tax.

Furthermore, eventually, inflation will eliminate the payroll tax savings an S corporation has traditionally delivered.

Specifically, once inflation pushes up a shareholder-employee’s reasonable wages to the Social Security maximum taxable earnings limit and pushes up that person’s household taxable income to the Biden net investment income tax trigger? The S Corporation no longer saves business owners payroll taxes.

The process takes time. But the effect shows up sooner than you might guess.

The Original Obamacare Tax Example

To give you a concrete example, you only need to look at the original Obamacare tax formula.

The original flavor of the Obamacare tax formula hit single taxpayers earning more than $200,000 of modified adjusted gross income. And it hit married taxpayers earning more than $250,000 of modified adjusted gross income.

In 2010 when Obamacare passed, people talked about those income thresholds representing top one percent situations. That sounds about right.

And note that in 2010 when Obamacare passed, the Social Security tax applied only on the first $106,800 of earnings.

Above that earnings level, any additional wages got hit with either the standard 2.9 percent Medicare tax or the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax.

The 2.9 percent tax applied to earnings over the $106,800 maximum taxable earnings threshold but under the $200,000 threshold.

Then above $200,000? That 3.8 percent Obamacare tax rate kicked in.

But the thing is? That bit of tax law also doesn’t adjust that $200,000 or $250,000 value for inflation. And that means the 2.9 percent bracket has shrunk in size due to inflation.

With a dozen years of inflation since the Obamacare law passed, many more people pay the Obamacare tax. Next year, the Social Security maximum taxable earnings limit will probably equal roughly $147,000. That’s my guess. That means the 2.9 percent payroll tax bracket shrinks to roughly $53,000. So almost half the size of the $93,000 bracket that existed when Obamacare passed.

All that income previously taxed at 2.9 percent? Tax law now levies instead either a 15.3 percent Social Security tax or the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax. And in a few years? Well, very possibly by the time Mr. Biden leaves office? The 2.9 percent Medicare bracket won’t even exist.

In a few years, in other words, the 15.3 percent tax may apply to the first $200,000 or more of income a person earns. And the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax will apply to any amounts in excess of that $200,000.

The Slow-Motion Death of the S Corporation

Now let’s return to the slow-motion death of the S corporation…

And a first point just so nobody overreacts: The death of the S corporation? It will take time. Lots of it.

I’m talking, and we’re worrying, about something that occurs incrementally over the next couple of decades or longer.

But it’s certainly worth noting that in coming years the S corporation tax savings steadily shrink. Especially for successful entrepreneurs.

Specifically, as inflation requires shareholder-employees to bump their salaries and so pay more and more of the 15.3 percent Social Security tax? And as more and more shareholder-employees pay the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax? Well, yeah, you need to think about all this. And probably starting as soon as the law passes. If it passes.

Note: Nonworking S corporations may already be subject to Obamacare taxes on their shares of S corporation profits as explained here: Avoiding Net Investment Income Tax.

Actionable Insights for Bid Tax Plan S Corporation

In fact, if you’re an entrepreneur or business owner, I think you want to consider three issues:

First,  if your business needs wages to qualify for the still generous Section 199A deduction Congress plans to provide through 2025? The S corporation option may still save you tax. The current Congressional Democrats’ tax proposal, which could easily change between the time I write this and the time you read it, gives business owners up to a $400,000 or $500,000 Section 199A deduction. So, a 199A deduction on roughly $2 million to $2.5 million of income. An S corporation may therefore make sense temporarily if only to create wages for the Section 199A deduction. (That deduction allows taxpayers to avoid paying tax on the last 20 percent of their business income.)

Second—and this is an however—if your situation revolves around a business or venture that may or will run decades? Yeah, you probably want to revisit your entity choice. Something else may make more sense. Let’s be honest. The historical reason to be an S corporation? So you save payroll taxes. The historical problems with an S corporation? You also lose flexibility and give up other tax benefits. Accordingly, if you lose or will lose payroll tax savings as compared to what you planned or hoped? Yeah, you need to consider other options. Like a limited liability company treated as a partnership. Or a traditional C corporation.

Third, and I am not going to go into details here, but you of course do have other ways to mitigate or sidestep the taxes Congressional Democrats and Mr. Biden propose hitting S corporations with. Your tax advisor, in fact, has a long list of planning techniques she or he can dust off and then use to dial down the taxes you ultimately pay. You may just need to be a bit more proactive. And go to a little more work.

Filed Under: business taxes, Corporate taxation, S corporation

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. VICTOR M MARTINEZ says

    September 20, 2021 at 9:13 am

    Interesting S-Corporation tax matter. Definitely Something to keep an eye on. Thank you so much for your advise.

  2. Ron Acher says

    September 20, 2021 at 9:28 am

    As you say, 99% of S-Corporation owners are not yet affected. And yes, the “successful” ones will be affected first, where “successful” means those above the various exemption thresholds for S-Corps (which may be why they are in S-Corps in the first place). But it would be interesting to know what proportion of S-Corp owners fall below those thresholds, say between now and 2025?

    2025 is important because the 199A benefit expires then. It is also important to understand that the 199A benefit is irrelevant if income is below the threshold established for that regulation — a point not well understood, or much elaborated on in related discussions that it would be good to see laid out in a simple mathematical example.

    For sole or small S-Corp owners, another very practical benefit of an S-Corp is that the owner can be on his or her own payroll, and thus not have to bother with quarterly estimated taxes. Should he or she choose to deduct minimal tax throughout the year, the balance can be made up in a lump sum tax contribution in the final payroll of the year (at which time the “fair” salary can also be decided), since payroll withholding taxes are considered as paid evenly throughout the year, no matter when withheld from the payroll.

    These can be substantial benefits if thought about beyond simple tax costs, if owner’s time, mindshare, bookkeeping, and tax processing costs are factored in.

    • Stephen Nelson CPA says

      September 21, 2021 at 9:00 am

      Good issues you raise, Ron. I think we’re mostly in agreement. Maybe totally in agreement?

Primary Sidebar

Welcome

Nelson CPA publishes this blog to help and encourage small business owners. Click here to learn more about our firm.

S corporation Tools

Use our S corporation tax savings calculator to make a quick estimate of the annual tax savings per owner.

Use our S corporation reasonable compensation calculator to estimate appropriate shareholder-employee salaries.

Featured Posts

Trump Savings Accounts provide a slick way for parents to save money for kids.

Trump Savings Accounts – Free Money from the Government

Child focused tax benefits have taken on many forms over the years.  We've had child tax credits, dependent care credits, education credits, 529 … [Read More...] about Trump Savings Accounts – Free Money from the Government

Combine Section 1031 like-kind exchanges with Section 168(k) bonus depreciation to create large deductions.

Bonus Depreciation and 1031 Exchanges: A Hidden Opportunity

Real estate investors know about bonus depreciation. They also know about 1031 like-kind exchanges. But not everyone realizes that the two rules can … [Read More...] about Bonus Depreciation and 1031 Exchanges: A Hidden Opportunity

100% bonus depreciation creates new opportunities for investors and entrepreneurs

The Section 168(k) Bonus Depreciation Purchased Requirement

You can get 100% bonus depreciation on tangible personal property assets you purchase and place into service after January 19, 2025. That seems … [Read More...] about The Section 168(k) Bonus Depreciation Purchased Requirement

International tax issues?

Preparing US tax returns for international taxpayers

Maximize S corporation tax savings

Setting Low S Corporation Salaries

Updated for 2019 tax year changes and now available in print from Amazon!!

Maximizing Sec. 199A Deductions

Free retirement planning help

Picture of Thirteen Word Retirement Plan book

Need to help clients with their PPP loan forgiveness applications?

Recent Comments

  • Planning for the 35% Washington State Estate Tax - Evergreen Small Business on Washington’s Qualified Family-Owned Business Interest Estate Tax Deduction: Updated for 2025
  • Stephen Nelson CPA on Washington State Professional Services Sales Tax
  • Mark Freeman on Washington State Professional Services Sales Tax
  • Washington State Professional Services Sales Tax - Evergreen Small Business on Washington’s Qualified Family-Owned Business Interest Estate Tax Deduction: Updated for 2025
  • The New Big Beautiful Section 199A Deduction - Evergreen Small Business on Big Beautiful Section 199A Calculator

Archives

Copyright © 2025 Stephen L. Nelson, Inc. · News Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress